The
foreword to The Reverse Tree says, “So what is The Reverse Tree
really about? Did I ever figure it out? I'm afraid I'm going to have
to leave that up to you, the reader.”
Unfortunately,
even the reader will not be able to figure out what it is all about.
Whether a tiny booklet running into only 36 pages, can be called a
book only because it is hard bound? The epilogue (another 11 pages) constitutes about the author, review of this book and critical acclaim for the author.
The
tag-line “trespassers won't be prosecuted .. this is all about you
and me!” is totally misguiding. The Reverse Tree is only about him
and that him is the author. Reverse tree is neither a collection of
poems nor of short stories. It is neither a collection of write ups on
contemporary issues nor is it poignant description of the author's
experiences.
If
you just analyze for the next few minutes what are you thinking
about, you will be surprised that you think about many things at a
time. You think of your childhood, you remember your deceased parent,
your estranged partner, your bank account, your barber, so on and so
forth. The list is endless. These thoughts are the result of your
past experiences and may not be related to each other in any way. Now
if you write all your thoughts which you had you will have some thing
like the Reverse Tree. It may cathartic for you, but it will make little
sense to the readers.
So
even if one of the reviews published in the book itself says that
“From his discussion of the third sex- comprised of transsexuals,
bisexuals and transgender individuals – to an academic yet
spiritual look into a selection of his favourite verses from The
Geeta, the author once again offers an interesting view of his life
and his Indian culture.”, there is little written about these
topics which would strike the chord with the readers. Idiosyncrasy of
author too can be at times interesting, I believe but The Reverse
Tree is insipid and banal. The author has wasted the opportunity
which he had got. His poems show promise. So he could have definitely
utilized the opportunity which this book had presented to him.
As
regards transgenders this is what the author has to say, “I often
wondered why one would marry a transgender! What pleasure can a man
derive from making love with another man who is feminine? How can a
person marry someone who can never satisfy his needs the way a female
can?” So according to the author only men are transgenders. Rather
transgenders are only men or men only. Ours is country which is still
coping to accept the LGBT community and making bold and incorrect
statements like these will only add to the confusion in the minds of our countrymen.
The
cover of the book is attractive. But don't judge a book by its cover,
they say.
No comments:
Post a Comment